I have has several people ask me this week about a testing framework or at least if we wanted minitest or rspec.
For the record I don’t have a preference but we should pick one and stick to it. I believe minitest is wining the race right now but I could be wrong.
Currently when doing PR’s against the new repos tests are not required but very strongly encouraged and most pr’s are including them.
Thoughts?
I would say that rspec is more suitable for the task - has more features and more or less standard de-facto right now in many ruby projects.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:59 AM Matt Jones mattjones@yieldbot.com wrote:
I have has several people ask me this week about a testing framework or at least if we wanted minitest or rspec.
For the record I don’t have a preference but we should pick one and stick to it. I believe minitest is wining the race right now but I could be wrong.
Currently when doing PR’s against the new repos tests are not required but very strongly encouraged and most pr’s are including them.
Thoughts?
–
Matt Jones @DevopsMatt
Infrastructure Engineer - Yieldbot Inc.
Core Contributor - Sensu Plugins
I too would suggest rspec.
Sean.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Artem Chernikov skullzeek@gmail.com wrote:
I would say that rspec is more suitable for the task - has more features and more or less standard de-facto right now in many ruby projects.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:59 AM Matt Jones mattjones@yieldbot.com wrote:
I have has several people ask me this week about a testing framework or at least if we wanted minitest or rspec.
For the record I don’t have a preference but we should pick one and stick to it. I believe minitest is wining the race right now but I could be wrong.
Currently when doing PR’s against the new repos tests are not required but very strongly encouraged and most pr’s are including them.
Thoughts?
–
Matt Jones @DevopsMatt
Infrastructure Engineer - Yieldbot Inc.
Core Contributor - Sensu Plugins